Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 30.06.2025 00:48

Thank you.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Aut explicabo sapiente quis consequuntur fuga consectetur fugit.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Microbiome: First bacteria we meet can keep us out of hospital - BBC
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Anyone Can Now Access the Largest Space Map Ever Created. Here's How - CNET
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
What’s next?
Scientists delve into Hells Canyon cave to solve mystery of America's deepest gorge - Live Science
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Android 16 QPR1 Beta 2 redesigns viewed notifications, now transparent - 9to5Google
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.